Barrister Susan Hedge pleads to Judge Williamson KC to believe in engineer fake formula and flooding

On 30-4-25 , Council Barrister, Susan Hedge, in the Case Manteit V Brisbane City Council, stood up and yelled to Planning Court Judge Williamson KC 

"His Honour must believe that the Andrew Corrigan report is very very believable, and should be relied upon by His Honour" (transcript)

Manteit supplied material to the Court at the commencement of the hearing to demonstrate that Andrew Corrigan had used a fake formula, 

fraction imperveous.

Dumbo  wine expert  Andrew Corrigan thought "Coefficient of discharge fi=.7 " is the Coefficient of Discharge. In fact QUDM means "use the fi=.7 in the formula for Coefficient of Discharge" 

instead the Coefficient of Discharge  = frequency facor * fraction imperveous/360 is the correct formula.

Susan Hedge believed the dumbo wine expert, then yelled to Judge Williamson "His Honour must belive this expert" Susan Hedge is willing to promote any fool to a Planning Court Judge.

Andrew Corrigan attempted to fool the Court by using the fake Queensland Drainage Manual formula in order to hoodwink the Planning Court and reduce the flooding levels of his own flooded hydraulic plans.

Andrew Corrigans stormwater plans are flooded, as admitted by him, but Susan Hedge continued to plead to Judge Williamson KC of the Planning Court that Andrew Corrigan was believable, and his report should be relied upon.

Andrew Corrigan has made aroud 150 mistakes in his plans and expert witness report. He says his own report is "rudimentary"

Andrew Corrigan admitted that he used the fake formula in order to reduce  he flooding flows of his own expert report.

Andrew Corrigan admitted to the Court (transcript) that his fake formula reduced flood levels by 15%. Susan Hedge was told this but still tried to promote Corrigan witness to Jusdge Williamson KC.

Can Susan Hedge be that stupid to try to convince a judge that a witness is believable who breaks Planning Schem laws?