Byth Chambers Susan Hedge barrister has tried to con Judge Williamson KC yet again on 29-4-25 by yelling and screaming "You must believe in my witness. He sends water uphill" (transcript).
The winemaster witness and Susan Hedge Byth Chambers tried to fool Judge Williamson KC of the Planning and Environment Court yet again, by sending water uphill, in the case of David Manteit v Brisbane City Council 2916/24.
Even Einstein can't send water uphill 550mm.
Byth Chambers Susan Hedge barrister is no Einstein. In fact from some of the Planning Court barristers I talk to about my new book to warn all Australians to look out for unlicenced engineers performing illegal design of hydraulic pipes, say that Susan Hedge is known in the building as "Simpleton Susan".
In the Planning and Environment Court case David Manteit V Brisbane City Council, Byth Chambers Susan Hedge barrister knew for 7 months that the 2 stormwater plans drawn by unlicenced Council employees and the 2 stormwater plans drawn by her winemaster witness Andrew Corrigan were flooded 1.2m under the Ashridge Rd Kerb.
That's a total of 4 Brisbane City Council hydrauaulic plans that have been intentionally drawn to flood Brisbane, centered at 128 Ashridge Rd Darra.
The Susan Hedge 7 months charade was at an end.
Susan Hedge was caught out by her own whistleblower winemaster witness.
Slippery Susan Hedge knew for 7 months that the Susan Hedge instructed report by winemaster Andrew Corrigan had 150 intentional errors to fool the Planning and Environment Court and was devised to deceive Judge Williamson KC.
The winemaster report was signed in Council offices in front of Susan Hedge and Sara McCabe. Susan Hedge and Sara McCabe watched Andrew Corrigan sign the shonky report on 23/4/25. Only 2 business days of the trial. Sara McCabe was the official witness.
Susan Hedge had known the witness for a very long time and knew the report contained the breaking of 23 Brisbane City Council laws, and the law of gravity.
Sara McCabe has been proven to make false statement in affidavits.
See "Sara McCabe" on this website
Susan Hedge was again in Contempt of Court of order by Judge Williamson KC, by refusing to file the witness report as ordered by Judge Williamson KC, on the 22/4/25. Only filed on 23/4/25.
Susan Hedge intentionally delayed the filing of the bogus winemaster witness report and disobeyed a court order. That's called contempt of Court.
Susan Hedge had already been granted one extension. Susan Hedge
intentionally failed to meet that extension granted by Judge Williamson KC until 23/4/25.
The signing of the report by the Councol witness in Counci's own offices makes a mockery of the so called "independent witness" theory.
Is is possible that any barrister in Australia would attempt to con a Planning and Environment Court by instructing a witness to provide a sworn report with fake engineering, flooded hydraulic plans and 150 intentional errors ?
(See Manteit 74 page audit below of the Susan Hedge Byth Chambers instructed shonky report is provided below and also available instantly free online on the Planning and Environment Court's eCourts system)
The list of the Susan Hedge intentional errors of her instructed witness is endless and many are listed endlessly on this website.
An audit by David Manteit of 74 pages of those 150 intentional errors and cons has been filed in Planning and Environment Court, see below. Read for yourself.
Is it possible that any barrister be dumber than Susan Hedge Byth Chambers ? Is it possible that any person uin Australia could be dumber than Susan Hedge ?
Susan Hedge Byth Chambers yelled and screamed to Judge Williamson KC "You must believe my witness !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. He is very very very believable." (transcript)
Only a dumber and dumber movie can make you laugh more.
Susan Byth Chambers barrister instructed the preparation of the winemaster witness to deceive Judge Williamson KC of the Planning and Environment Court.
In additon, there will be a Contemt of Court application filed soon against Susan Hedge and Brisbane City Council, as sure as night follows day.
In addition -------
On 24/4 25 Susan Hedge at the pretrial hearing, lied to judge Williamson KC at least 10 times. (transcript)
On 24/4/25, Judge Williamson KC asked Susan Hedge 3 times, in 5 minutes-
"What is Council's position for the trial , Ms Hedge ?" (transcript)
Susan Hedge said to Judge Williamson - "As per Court document 23, filed on 31/1/25, Your Honour"(transcript)
Judge Williamson KC then advised David Manteit 5 times that Council's positon for the trial, on 24/4/25, at 11am, was that as of 31/1/25. (transcript). Tbe triia began 5 business hours later.
Judge Williamson KC asked Susan Hedge on 24/4/25 - "Is there anything else you wish to tell me now, about the trial starting Monday ?
Susan Hedge "No, Your Honour"
That's about 10 lies by Susan Hedge right there, plus many more.
A totally different position was filed in the Court by Susan Hedge ,as little as 30 minutes later.
Lies to a judge 10 times in one hour are commonly called Contempt of Court.
This Susan Hedge position would have taken 2 weeks to prepare, involving Council staff changing 81 metres red lines.
Susan Hedge had intentionally lied and failed to inform Judge Williamson KC of the change in position until 10am on the day of the trial, one business day later.